Dai's life public
Corey Arnold

Sent to you by Dai via Google Reader: Corey Arnold via Fubiz™ by Versa
on 3/31/12

Corey Arnold est à la fois photographe et pêcheur commercial. Basé en
Alaska, ce dernier cultive un amour pour la photographie et chercher à
immortaliser l’intensité d’une telle pratique ainsi que des moments
plus poétiques. Une sélection est à découvrir dans la suite.

Previously on Fubiz
- Kevin Twomey Photography
- Back to Childhood Series
- In Thoughts Series
Copyright Fubiz™ - Suivez nous sur Twitter et Facebook

Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to Fubiz™ using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your
favorite sites

Why Google Might Be Going to $0

Sent to you by Dai via Google Reader: Why Google Might Be Going to $0
via TechCrunch by James Altucher on 3/31/12

Editor’s note: James Altucher is an investor, programmer, author, and
entrepreneur. He is Managing Director of Formula Capital and has
written 6 books on investing. His latest books are I Was Blind But Now
I See and FAQ ME. You can follow him on Twitter @jaltucher.

Ken Lang could perform miracles. In 1990 we would head off to a bar
near where we were going to graduate school for computer science, and
we would bring a Go board. Then we would drink and play Go for five
hours. At the end of the five hours, after a grueling battle over the
board, I remember this one time when magically Ken would show up with
two girls who were actually willing to sit down and hang out with two
guys who had a GO BOARD in front of them. How did Ken do that?

Fast forward: 1991, CMU asks me to leave graduate school, citing lack
of maturity. The professor who threw me out still occasionally calls me
up asking me when I’m going to be mature enough.

Fast forward: 1994, one of our classmates, Michael Mauldin is working
on a database that automatically sorts by category pages his spider
retrieves on the Internet. The name of his computer: lycos.cs.cmu.edu.
Lycos eventually spins out of CMU, becomes the biggest seach engine,
and goes public with a multi-billion dollar valuation.

Fast forward: Ken Lang starts a company called WiseWire. I was
incredibly skeptical. I read through what the company is about. “No
way,” I think to myself, “that this is going to make any money”.

1998: Ken files a patent that classified how search results and ad
results are sorted based on the number of click-thrus an ad gets. He
sells the company to Lycos for $40 million. Ken Lang becomes CTO of
Lycos and they take over his patents.

$40 million! What? And then Lycos stock skyrockets up. I can’t believe
it. I’m happy for my friend but also incredibly jealous although later
in 1998 I sell my first company as well. Still, I wanted to be the only
one I knew who made money. I didn’t think it was fun when other people
I knew made money. And, anyway, weren’t search engines dead? I
mean,what was even the business model?

Fast forward: the 2000s. Almost every search engine dies. Excite,
Lycos, Altavista. Before that “the world wide web worm”. Lycos got
bought by a Spanish company, then a Korean company, then an Indian
company. To be honest, I don’t even know who owns it now. It has a
breathing tube and a feeding tube. Somehow, in a complete coma, it is
being kept alive.

One search engine, a little company called Google, figured out how to
make money.

One quick story: I was a venture capitalist in 2001. A company, Oingo,
which later became Applied Semantics, had a technique for how search
engines could make money by having people bid for ads. My partner at
the firm said, “we can probably pick up half this company for cheap.
They are running out of money.” It was during the Internet bust.

“Are you kidding me, “ I said. “they are in the search engine business.
That’s totally dead.” And I went back to playing the Defender machine
that was in my office. That I would play all day long even while
companies waited in the conference room. (See: “10 Unusual Things I
Didn’t Know About Google, Plus How I Made the Worst VC Decision Ever“)

A year later they were bought by Google for 1% of Google. Our half
would’ve now been worth hundreds of millions if we had invested. I was
the worst venture capitalist ever. They had changed their name from
Oingo to Applied Semantics to what became within Google…AdWords and
AdSense, which has been 97% of Google’s revenues since 2001. 97%. $67
billion dollars.

Don’t worry. I’m getting to it.

(Yahoo won hundreds of millions from Google on the Overture patent even
before Google amassed the bulk of their $67 billion in overall revenues
from AdWords)

Fast forward. Overture, another search engine company that no longer
exists (Yahoo bought it) files a patent for a bidding system for ads on
a search engine. The patent office says (I’m paraphrasing), “you can
file patents on A, B, and C. But not D, E, and F. Because Ken Lang from
Lycos filed those patents already.”

Overture/Yahoo goes on to successfully sue Google based on the patents
they did win. Google settled right before they went public but long
before they achieved the bulk of their revenues.

Lycos goes on to being a barely breathing, comatose patient. Fast
forward to 2011. Ken Lang buys his patents back from Lycos for almost
nothing. He starts a company: I/P Engine. Two weeks ago he announced he
was merging his company with a public company, Vringo (Nasdaq: VRNG).
Because it’s Ken, I buy the stock although will buy more after this
article is out and readers read this.

The company sues Google for a big percentage of those $67 billion in
revenues plus future revenues. The claim: Google has willfully
infringed on Vringo – I/P’s patents for sorting ads based on
click-throughs. I remember almost 20 years ago when Ken was working on
the software. “Useless!” I thought then. Their claim: $67 billion of
Google’s revenues come from this patent. All of Google’s revenues going
forward come from this patent. And every search engine which uses
Google is allegedly infringing on the Vringo patent and is being sued.

Think: Interactive Corp (Nasdaq: IACI) with Ask.com. Think AOL. Think
Target which internally uses Google’s technologies. Think Gannett,
which uses Google’s technology and is also being sued. Think,
eventually, thousands of Google’s customers who use AdSense.

Think: “willfully”. Why should you think that? Two reasons. Overture
already sued Google. Google is aware of Yahoo/Overture’s patent
history. The patent history officially stated that Ken Lang/Lycos
already has patented some of this technology. What does “willfully”
mean in legal terms? Triple damages.

Why didn’t Lycos ever sue? After Lycos had its massive stroke and was
left to die in a dirty hospital room with some uncaring nurse changing
it’s bedpans twice a day, Google was STILL Lycos’s biggest customer.
Why sue your biggest customer? Operating companies rarely sue other
operating companies. Then there are countersuits, loss of revenues, and
all sorts of ugly things. The breathing tube would’ve been pulled out
of Lycos and it would’ve been left to die.

Think: NTP suing RIMM on patents. NTP had nothing going on other than
the patents. Like Vringo/Innovate. NTP won over $600 million from RIMM
once Research in Motion realized this is a serious issue and not one
they can just chalk up to a bad nightmare.

(the beginning of the end for RIMM)

Guess who NTP’s lawyer was? Donald Stout. Guess who Vringo’s patent
lawyer is? Donald Stout. Why is Donald Stout so good? He was an
examiner at the US Patent Office. He knows patents. They announced all
of this but nobody reads announcements of a small public company like
Vringo. It’s hard enough figuring out how many pixels are on the screen
of Apple’s amazng iPad 3.

Well, Google must have a defense? Even though their AdWords results are
sorted by click-throughs in the way described by the patent maybe they
sorted in a different way (a “work-around” of the patent), and didn’t
infringe on the patent.

Maybe: But look at Google economist Hal Varian describing their
algorithm right here in this video. And compare with the patent claim
filed in court by Vringo. You decide. But it looks like the exact same
to me.

Maybe: But does Google want to risk losing ten billion dollars plus
having all of their customers sued. The district the case is getting
tried in rules 70% in favor of the plaintiff in patent cases. Most
patent trials get settled on the court steps.

Maybe: But then there’s still Microsoft /Yahoo search which, by the
way, sorts based on click-throughs and has not been sued yet.

Guess what? Google’s patent lawyer is Quinn-Emmanuel. They are
defending Google. Oh, and here’s something funny. Guess who Yahoo’s
lawyer is? Yahoo is suing Facebook for patent infringement in the
search domain. Quinn-Emanuel. So the same lawyer is both defending and
accusing in the same domain. Someone’s going to settle. Everyone will
settle. If anyone loses this case then the entire industry is going
down in the same lawsuit and the exact same lawyer will be stuck on
both sides of the fence. I’m not a lawyer but that smells. The trial is
October 16 in the Eastern District Court of Virginia and will last 2
weeks. An appeal process can take, at most, a year.

I’ve known Ken for 23 years. I’ve been in the trenches with him when he
was writing what I thought was his useless software. I watched his
company get bought and we’ve talked about these technologies through
the decades.

I’ve read the patent case. I watched Hal Varian’s video. Also look at
this link on Google’s site where they describe their algorithm. Compare
with the patent claim. I have a screenshot if they decide to take it
down. $67 billion in revenues from this patent. Imagine: double that in
the next ten years. Imagine: triple damages.

Vringo will have an $80 million market capitalization post their merger
with I/P. NTP won $600 million from RIMM using the same lawyer. RIMM’s
revenues are a drop in the bucket compared to Google. And compared to
1000s of Google’s customers who will be embarrassed when the lawyer
shows up at their door also. That’s why I made my investment
accordingly. Is Google going to take the risk this happens?

I doubt it.

You can think to yourself: “ugh, patent trolls are disgusting”. But the
protection of intellectual property is what America is built on. Smart
people invent things. Then they get to protect the intellectual
property on what they invents. Other companies can’t steal that
technology. That’s why we have such a problem outsourcing to China and
other countries where we are worried they might steal our intellectual
property. Patents are the defense mechanism for capitalism.

Ken can perform miracles. But no miracle would save me. At the end of
one evening of Go playing and beer drinking in 1990 we gave two girls
our phone numbers. I don’t know if Ken ever got the call. I didn’t. But
I guess I’m happy where it all ended up.

Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to TechCrunch using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your
favorite sites

在无锡,荣巷偶然看到的老房子。 (Taken with picplz.)

在无锡,荣巷偶然看到的老房子。 (Taken with picplz.)

崩坏的某教室内 (Taken with picplz.)

崩坏的某教室内 (Taken with picplz.)

未完成的小夜曲 (2011-07-07 13:52:56)转载
标签: 书评 石黑一雄 小夜曲 杂谈 分类: 读书笔记
载 经济观察报 书评增刊